ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Georg Henneges
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 100 | Number 3 | November 1988 | Pages 314-323
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A29045
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity effects of material rearrangements, simulating conditions in a postulated liquid-metal fast breeder reactor accident, were measured in three different critical assemblies. SNEAK-12A, a single-zone core, fueled with enriched uranium metal plates; SNEAK-12B, which had a central test zone fueled with Pu0202 rod bundles surrounded by a buffer and a driver zone; and SNEAK-12C, which had nearly the same integral compositions as SNEAK-12B but was loaded totally with plates. The reactivity effects were calculated using current Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe methods and data and, in part, also using the corresponding modules of the SIMMER-11 accident analysis system. Also, for some configurations, a comparison of measured and calculated fission rate distributions was performed., The evaluation yielded similar results for the three assemblies. For most cases investigated, satisfactory agreement between theory and experiment was reached when two-dimensional transport eigenvalue calculations or exact transport perturbation methods were used. As long as larger deviations occurred, transport results generally were on the conservative side. First-order transport perturbation theory only worked well in a limited number of cases. Diffusion calculations often led to large discrepancies, particularly when the experiments involved fuel dilution.