ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
D. E. Wood
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1959 | Pages 45-48
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A27328
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron leakage through a reactor shield composed primarily of iron is discussed. This is of interest whenever the hydrogen content of a shield is reduced either by design requirements or thermal deterioration. Work done at several sites on individual aspects of the problem is combined to present an over-all description of the neutron streaming. In general there are two different phenomena involved, each determined by the geometry. In the case of a long thin streaming path, such as a structural member penetrating the shield, the leakage consists of neutrons which have suffered no collisions. These neutrons will have energies corresponding to energies at which the iron total cross section is small. Iron has several antiresonances in the interval 25 to 100 kev, with the largest dip apparently at 25 kev, so most of the neutron leakage will be at these energies. The other case involves the attenuation of neutrons by large slabs of iron with little or no hydrogen (or other good moderator) present. The 25 kev neutrons are still present, but they are augmented by a large number of neutrons of energy between thermal and 1 Mev. These neutrons may have collided elastically many times but with only a small energy loss each time. Above 1 Mev, inelastic scattering suppresses the leakage, and below a few volts, absorption removes the neutrons.