ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Atomics announces breeding blanket test facility
General Atomics announced it is developing design concepts in collaboration with the Department of Energy for the Fusion Blanket Component Test Facility (BCTF), which will test full-scale breeding blankets.
“No one has tested a fusion blanket at this scale. While there are more research and development challenges ahead, a BCTF brings us closer to turning fusion from proven science into practical, sustainable power,” said Anantha Krishnan, senior vice president of the General Atomics Energy Group.
D. E. Wood
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 1 | January 1959 | Pages 45-48
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A27328
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron leakage through a reactor shield composed primarily of iron is discussed. This is of interest whenever the hydrogen content of a shield is reduced either by design requirements or thermal deterioration. Work done at several sites on individual aspects of the problem is combined to present an over-all description of the neutron streaming. In general there are two different phenomena involved, each determined by the geometry. In the case of a long thin streaming path, such as a structural member penetrating the shield, the leakage consists of neutrons which have suffered no collisions. These neutrons will have energies corresponding to energies at which the iron total cross section is small. Iron has several antiresonances in the interval 25 to 100 kev, with the largest dip apparently at 25 kev, so most of the neutron leakage will be at these energies. The other case involves the attenuation of neutrons by large slabs of iron with little or no hydrogen (or other good moderator) present. The 25 kev neutrons are still present, but they are augmented by a large number of neutrons of energy between thermal and 1 Mev. These neutrons may have collided elastically many times but with only a small energy loss each time. Above 1 Mev, inelastic scattering suppresses the leakage, and below a few volts, absorption removes the neutrons.