ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
T. A. Gabriel, B. L. Bishop
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 68 | Number 1 | October 1978 | Pages 94-99
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27274
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The sensitivity of primary knock-on atom (PKA) spectra and displacement per atom (dpa) cross sections to different secondary neutron energy and angular distributions and “in-group” weighting schemes is investigated. It is shown that the sensitivity of the PKA spectra and dpa cross sections for the (n, n′ unresolved) and (n, 2n) reactions in iron to different angular distributions and the same secondary neutron spectrum is reasonably large (∼15%). For grossly different secondary neutron spectra and the same angular distribution, the change in the dpa cross section is smaller than one would initially expect. It is also shown that for aluminum, the sensitivity of dpa cross sections to different in-group weighting schemes is, for the most part, small.
