ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40—2025
Last year, we proudly launched the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 list to shine a spotlight on the exceptional young professionals driving the nuclear sector forward as the nuclear community faces a dramatic generational shift. We weren’t sure how a second list would go over, but once again, our members resoundingly answered the call, confirming what we already knew: The nuclear community is bursting with vision, talent, and extraordinary dedication.
K. D. Kirby, R. A. Karam
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 59 | Number 3 | March 1976 | Pages 215-230
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE76-A26820
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Effective resonance cross sections used in the analysis of heterogeneous reactors have generally been obtained through the use of equivalence theory and/or integral transport theory. One fundamentally restrictive assumption common to equivalence theory and most integral transport methods is the flat-source approximation. The assessment of this approximation was recently completed and comprised the following: 1. comparison of the broad-group cross sections of 238U in the resolved resonance region using. a. the flat-source approximation b. the exact source distribution c. the rational approximation with a Levine-type factor 2. comparisons in (1) for three types of reactors. a. typical zero power reactor (ZPR) assembly b. liquid-metal fast breeder reactor commercial power station c. light-water power reactor. The main conclusion was that even though there were significant differences between the exactly calculated escape probabilities and those calculated with the flat-source approximation, additional differences between the general energy-dependent reciprocity and the energy-independent (but often erroneously applied as energy-dependent) reciprocity relation almost completely compensated for the error in the flat-source escape probabilities. Due to this unusual and somewhat unexpected compensating effect, the effective capture cross sections of 238U in the resolved resonance region, generated by the three methods stated above, were essentially the same.