ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Surplus plutonium for power reactor fuel: What’s on offer
The Department of Energy has a plan for private companies to “dispose of surplus plutonium”—about 19.7 metric tons in both oxide and metal forms—by “making the materials available for advanced nuclear technologies.” A Surplus Plutonium Utilization Program request for applications (RFA) issued October 21 describes the plutonium on offer, and the “thresholds” prospective applicants must meet.
J. T. Mihalczo
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 56 | Number 3 | March 1975 | Pages 271-290
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-3
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The spatial distribution of the neutron importance in bare and natural-uranium-reflected uranium (∼93.2 wt% 235U) and plutonium (∼4.7 at % 240Pu) metal spheres was measured using 252Cf neutron sources. The spatial distribution of the fission density from activation measurements in the bare spheres and those previously measured for the reflected spheres are presented.Comparison of these distributions with those from S16 transport theory calculations showed that the measured and calculated results agreed very well for the bare spheres and in the central core of the reflected spheres. The disagreement in the natural uranium reflector increased with radius and attained values as large as ∼35% at the outer surface. The sensitivity of the calculations to the cross sections is examined.These measurements were undertaken to properly account for spatial effects in the point reactor kinetics description of Rossi-α measurements. The spatial-effects factors obtained from these measurements, which multiply the correlated amplitude of the Rossi-α measurement, were 1.123, 1.109, 1.163, and 1.214 for the bare uranium, bare plutonium, reflected uranium, and reflected plutonium spheres, respectively. The error in these values is ± 0.010.