ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Molten salt research is focus of ANS local section presentation
The American Nuclear Society’s Chicago–Great Lakes Local Section hosted a presentation on February 27 on developments at the molten salt research reactor at Abilene Christian University’s Nuclear Energy Experimental Testing (NEXT) Lab.
A recording of the presentation is available on the ANS website.
M. H. Lletzke, R. W. Stoughton, Marjorie P. Lietzke
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 16 | Number 1 | May 1963 | Pages 25-30
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26475
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A generalized least squares technique has been used to calculate equilibrium constants and their variation with medium in solvent extraction equilibria by minimizing the difference between observed and calculated distribution ratios. The model involved a Debye-Hückel term for low and a linear term for high ionic concentration corrections (i.e., activity coefficient changes) in the aqueous phase, consistent with current semitheoretical treatments. In the organic phase either no correction or a linear term in volume % TBP was found adequate to about 20 vol. % TBP. The method involved the evaluation of the assumed parameters in the least squares sense while iteratively correcting for ionic strength changes with varying (calculated) ionic concentrations. Due to imprecision of the data and to convergence difficulties encountered in nonlinear procedures, it was not feasible to evaluate as many parameters as desired, and hence the model had to be oversimplified in some cases. Nevertheless, the method has been successfully applied to the extraction of uranyl nitrate and nitric acid by TBP dissolved in an inert diluent. It is suggested that with sufficiently precise and consistent data the method is capable of evaluating all the equilibrium parameters involved in relatively complex extraction systems. A series of computer programs has been written in an attempt to calculate distribution ratios in relatively complex solvent extraction systems. The general procedure involved setting up equilibrium expressions and determining the parameters by a generalized least squares technique. The present paper describes calculations on the distribution of UO2(NO3)2 and HNO3 between an aqueous phase and an organic phase consisting of tributyl phosphate (TBP) dissolved in an inert diluent (Amsco 125-90W).1 Since it was desired to keep the model simple and since convergence difficulties were encountered when the model was made more realistically elaborate, the assumed equilibria do not necessarily involve all species which may have been shown to exist in some of the solutions in question (e.g., UO2NO3+ and UO2(NO3)2).
