ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
New laws offer nuclear industry incentives for existing power plant uprates
This year, the U.S. nuclear industry received a much-needed economic boost that could help preserve operating nuclear power plants and incentivize upgrades that extend their lifespan and power output.
Signed into law in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act offers production tax credits (PTCs) for existing nuclear power plants and either PTCs or investment tax credits (ITCs) for new carbon-free generation. These credits could make power uprates—increasing the maximum power level at which a commercial plant may operate—a much more appealing option for utilities.
M. H. Lletzke, R. W. Stoughton, Marjorie P. Lietzke
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 16 | Number 1 | May 1963 | Pages 25-30
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE63-A26475
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A generalized least squares technique has been used to calculate equilibrium constants and their variation with medium in solvent extraction equilibria by minimizing the difference between observed and calculated distribution ratios. The model involved a Debye-Hückel term for low and a linear term for high ionic concentration corrections (i.e., activity coefficient changes) in the aqueous phase, consistent with current semitheoretical treatments. In the organic phase either no correction or a linear term in volume % TBP was found adequate to about 20 vol. % TBP. The method involved the evaluation of the assumed parameters in the least squares sense while iteratively correcting for ionic strength changes with varying (calculated) ionic concentrations. Due to imprecision of the data and to convergence difficulties encountered in nonlinear procedures, it was not feasible to evaluate as many parameters as desired, and hence the model had to be oversimplified in some cases. Nevertheless, the method has been successfully applied to the extraction of uranyl nitrate and nitric acid by TBP dissolved in an inert diluent. It is suggested that with sufficiently precise and consistent data the method is capable of evaluating all the equilibrium parameters involved in relatively complex extraction systems. A series of computer programs has been written in an attempt to calculate distribution ratios in relatively complex solvent extraction systems. The general procedure involved setting up equilibrium expressions and determining the parameters by a generalized least squares technique. The present paper describes calculations on the distribution of UO2(NO3)2 and HNO3 between an aqueous phase and an organic phase consisting of tributyl phosphate (TBP) dissolved in an inert diluent (Amsco 125-90W).1 Since it was desired to keep the model simple and since convergence difficulties were encountered when the model was made more realistically elaborate, the assumed equilibria do not necessarily involve all species which may have been shown to exist in some of the solutions in question (e.g., UO2NO3+ and UO2(NO3)2).
