ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
G. S. Rosenberg, C. K. Youngdahl
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 13 | Number 2 | June 1962 | Pages 91-102
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The response of flat, thin, parallel, metal fuel elements to the loads imposed by the flow of coolant through reactor core passages is examined for the existence of plate divergence at velocities above a “critical” value. It is shown that small modifications of the simplifying assumptions used in the analysis produce a great difference in the conclusions regarding the possibility of divergence and the interpretation of the “critical” coolant velocity. The basic assumptions are the same as those of Miller (1), except that fluid inertia effects are included in the analysis of periodically supported plates. Although agreement exists between the results of the dynamic model of Section I and that of “neutral equilibrium” used by Miller, the additional consideration of fluid inertia leads to a different interpretation of “critical” velocity for periodically supported plates treated in Section II.