ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
D. H. Jones, R. P. Christman
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 12 | Number 2 | February 1962 | Pages 276-284
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE62-A26068
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The first Shippingport seed-blanket core was operated for 5530 equivalent full power hours at equilibrium xenon and samarium conditions. The comparison of physics measurements and calculations presented are those applicable to the first core containing the initial seed material. A three-dimensional diffusion theory depletion analysis indicates that this calculational model describes with reasonable accuracy the directly observed and inferred reactor parameters examined over core lifetime. The reactor parameters compared include: criticality, reactivity lifetime, xenon transient behavior, temperature coefficients, and blanket power fraction. While the primary emphasis is on the three-dimensional calculational and experimental comparisons, the results of one and two-dimensional diffusion theory depletion calculations are included to indicate their relative merit. The results indicate that such reactor parameters as excess reactivity, temperature coefficients, and blanket power fraction, may be estimated to within approximately the same accuracy by one and two-dimensional depletion models as by this particular three-dimensional model. This conclusion must be qualified by noting the crudeness employed in the three-dimensional depletion model.