ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
From renaissance to reality: Infrastructure for a global nuclear fuel cycle
Dale Klein
This article was adapted from the author’s speech during a plenary at the 21st International Symposium on the Packaging and Transportation of Radioactive Materials (PATRAM 2025), San Antonio, Texas, July 2025.
There has been a lot of discussion lately about reforming the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. But I want to be clear: When it comes to nuclear safety and security, there is no place for partisan politics. I support efforts to streamline regulatory processes, but the independence and integrity of the NRC must remain sacrosanct. If we are serious about expanding nuclear power and reclaiming our global leadership in nuclear technology, having a strong independent regulator is fundamental.
Right now, we’re on the edge of a global nuclear resurgence driven by rising demand from data centers, growing concerns about energy security, and the need to decarbonize industry.
W. K. Anderson C. J. Beck, J. S. Theilacker
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 9 | Number 1 | January 1961 | Pages 1-15
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE61-A25858
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The cost of control rods which contributes a significant fraction to the total cost of a power reactor core is discussed as a function of metallurgical composition and reactor endurance. Materials considered include hafnium, Cd5-In15-Ag80 alloy, several boron carrying systems, and dispersions of such rare earth oxides as Eu2O3, Gd2O3, and Dy2O3. Costs based on a thorough analysis of processing variables and raw material prices are presented for a variety of rods for a specific reactor design considered typical of enriched power plants of the present generation. Concentrations were established by an approximate method described by Stevens. Although this method is relatively crude, results are considered adequate for purposes of this paper. For long-lived cores the lowest cost rods of proven composition were a composite rod with hafnium tip and boron dispersion upper blade or hafnium rods if the hafnium can be bought at presently quoted zirconium co-product prices. Rare earth cermets of properly adjusted composition also fell into an interesting price range. Boron dispersions though lower in cost cannot be considered among the proven materials for long-lived high burn-up cores. For shut down rods or cores of shorter endurance boron steels offer a low cost solution to the problem. For cores of intermediate endurance or shut down rods for longer endurance cores, Cd-In-Ag alloy rods may be of use and are certainly economically attractive.