ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Nano to begin drilling next week in Illinois
It’s been a good month for Nano Nuclear in the state of Illinois. On October 7, the Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker announced that the company would be awarded $6.8 million from the Reimagining Energy and Vehicles in Illinois Act to help fund the development of its new regional research and development facility in the Chicago suburb of Oak Brook.
M. A. Robkin, M. Clark, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 8 | Number 5 | November 1960 | Pages 437-442
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25826
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
It is observed that the formal mathematical adjoint of the integral form of the solution of the Boltzmann equation is not the same as, and is not a solution for, the formal mathematical adjoint to the integro-differential form. If the concept of importance is to have a unique physical meaning, there must be a basic physical difference between the adjoint integral and the integral solution to the integro-differential equation. We show that such a physical difference can be specified, that the concept of “inverse causality” is unnecessary, and that normal “forward” causality is sufficient to derive the importance from first principles. The resulting equations for the importance distributions are then shown to be completely consistent with all requirements of orthogonality between these distributions and the neutron distributions.