ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
A series of firsts delivers new Plant Vogtle units
Southern Nuclear was first when no one wanted to be.
The nuclear subsidiary of the century-old utility Southern Company, based in Atlanta, Ga., joined a pack of nuclear companies in the early 2000s—during what was then dubbed a “nuclear renaissance”—bullish on plans for new large nuclear facilities and adding thousands of new carbon-free megawatts to the grid.
In 2008, Southern Nuclear applied for a combined construction and operating license (COL), positioning the company to receive the first such license from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission in 2012. Also in 2008, Southern became the first U.S. company to sign an engineering, procurement, and construction contract for a Generation III+ reactor. Southern chose Westinghouse’s AP1000 pressurized water reactor, which was certified by the NRC in December 2011.
Fast forward a dozen years—which saw dozens of setbacks and hundreds of successes—and Southern Nuclear and its stakeholders celebrated the completion of Vogtle Units 3 and 4: the first new commercial nuclear power construction project completed in the U.S. in more than 30 years.
B. W. LeTourneau, R. E. Grimble
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 7 | Number 5 | May 1960 | Pages 458-467
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE60-A25745
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
One possible nuclear reactor fuel element design consists of plate-type subassemblies cut transversely into a number of sections in the direction of flow. The use of such interrupted-plate elements should result in lower surface temperatures than full-length plate-type subassemblies by taking advantage of both a continuous entrance effect on the film coefficient of heat transfer (1) and reduced engineering hot channel factors. The purpose of this paper is to report the results of experimental investigations of the pressure drop through such interrupted-plate-type fuel elements. In particular, the joint losses between adjacent sections of a plate-type subassembly, and the entrance-pIus-exit losses on entering the initial section and leaving the final section of subassembly, have been measured as a function of Reynolds Number and, in the case of the joint losses, as a function of the spacing between the sections. Measurements have been made on six configurations; one subassembly with the plates in adjacent sections of the subassembly parallel and one with them perpendicular to each other (in-line and crossed), each subassembly being tested for the square-edged, rounded leading edge, and both ends rounded cases. Most of the measurements were made on 2 in. long sections of 2.1-in. sq. subassembly containing ten 0.087 × 1.82 in. plates and eleven 0.087 × 1.82 in. channels. The effect of longer sections was also investigated. Experimental values of dimensionless joint loss and entrance-pIus-exit loss coefficients were calculated from experimental over-all pressure drops using values for the friction factor from the literature. These experimental loss coefficients are presented graphically as a function of Reynolds Number for each configuration tested. All of the loss coefficients showed slight decreases with increasing Reynolds Number in the range tested (Reynolds Numbers from 10,000 to 100,000). Values of the joint loss coefficients are also presented graphically as a function of spacing between the sections for each configuration at a Reynolds Number of 50,000. This graph shows that the joint loss coefficients are higher than the entrance-plus-exit loss coefficients if the adjacent plate sections are square-edged and crossed, approximately the same if the adjacent sections are crossed but have rounded ends, and lower if the adjacent sections are in-line. The joint loss coefficients approach the experimental entrance-plus-exit coefficients (which agreed well with values in the literature) at large spacings, and the two were essentially equal when the spacing reached 0.05 to 0.50 in. depending on the configuration.