ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
R. J. Mcwhorter, John Russell, Bertram Wolfe
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 5 | Number 6 | June 1959 | Pages 382-389
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE59-A25614
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The use of thermally black control sheets in a reactor is examined for three special cases: a finite slab reactor with a control sheet at its midplane, an infinite slab reactor containing an array of uniformly spaced control sheets, and a finite slab reactor with two control sheets placed symmetrically about the reactor centerline. The critical equation is obtained in each case and the physical significance of the solutions is examined by allowing the critical parameters to take limiting values. The conclusions reached are: (1) For τ/L2 « 1, thermally black control sheets are effectively black to all neutrons and divide the reactor into independent parts provided the distance W between control sheets, or core boundary and control sheet, is » τ3/2/L2. For W ≾τ3/2/L2, the control sheet is less effective. (2) For τ/L2 » 1 and W » τ/L, thermally black control sheets effectively divide the reactor into independent parts. For W ≾τ/L, the control sheets are less effective. (3) For τ/L2 » 1, W/L » 1, and W2/τ ∼ 1, a thermally black control sheet is relatively ineffective as compared with a sheet black to all neutrons. (4) The criteria for placing a given number of sheets most effectively in a reactor depend upon the worth of the sheets as determined from the conditions above. Thus, for sheets which are essentially black to all neutrons, the position of maximum effectiveness occurs when the reactor is cut into pieces of nearly equal size. However, for sheets of less worth, the positions of maximum effectiveness occur closer to the center of the reactor. In the limiting case, where the control effectiveness is very much smaller than the leakage from the reactor, the sheets should be placed about the reactor center, separated by about one diffusion length. It is pointed out that a very weak thermally black control element in a very large reactor may produce a large effect on the power distribution.