ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
Martin A. Lopez de Bertodano, Jian-Feng Shi,Stephen G. Beus
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 126 | Number 1 | May 1997 | Pages 108-114
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE97-A24462
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
New experimental data are obtained for pressure drop and entrainment for annular upflow in a vertical pipe. The 9.5-mm pipe has a hydraulic diameter similar to the subchannels in the fuel assemblies of water-cooled reactors. The test section has a length-to-diameter ratio of 440 to ensure fully developed annular flow. The pressure covers the range from 140 to 660 kPa. Therefore, the density ratio is varied by a factor of ∼4. This allows the investigation of the effect of pressure on the interfacial shear models. Gas superficial velocities between 25 and 126 m/s are tested, extending the range of previous data to higher gas velocities. The data are compared with well-known models for interfacial shear that represent the state of the art. Good results are obtained with the models by Wallis, and Henstock and Hanratty. When the model by Asali, Hanratty, and Andreussi is modified for the effect of pressure, the agreement is also good, and the data collapse with very little scatter. There is a close relationship between these models and mixing length theory such that the models may be viewed as correlations for the surface roughness. This points toward a more fundamental approach in terms of the interfacial structure.