ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
NRC begins special inspection at Hope Creek
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special inspection at Hope Creek nuclear plant in New Jersey to investigate the cause of repeated inoperability of one of the plant’s emergency diesel generators, the agency announced in a February 25 news release.
Taewan Noh, Warren F. Miller, Jr.
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 124 | Number 1 | September 1996 | Pages 18-30
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24221
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using the operator form of a synthetic acceleration, the P1 acceleration [diffusion synthetic acceleration (DSA)] and P2 acceleration schemes for one-dimensional slab and the P1 and simplified P2 acceleration schemes for two-dimensional x-y geometry are derived. The convergence rate of each scheme for a simple model problem is compared, and the result is generalized by performing a Fourier analysis. In the one-dimensional case, the new second-moment P2 acceleration outperforms an earlier third-moment P2 acceleration developed by Miller and Larsen. However, it is still less efficient than P1 acceleration. Similar results show that the P1 acceleration converges faster than the simplified P2 acceleration in two-dimensional x-y geometry. These results confirm that one cannot simply assume that replacement of the DSA method with a higher order operator will lead to a smaller spectral radius.