ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
Taek Kyum Kim, Chang Hyo Kim
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 123 | Number 3 | July 1996 | Pages 381-391
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-A24201
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A method for determining the mathematical adjoint solution of a higher order nodal expansion method (NEM) based on the simultaneous solution of multigroup equations for each node in the rectangular geometry is presented. In the higher order NEM, the forward NEM equations in a given node include not only the nodal balance and interface-current equations but also weighted residual method (WRM) equations for higher order expansion coefficients. In deriving the mathematical adjoint equations corresponding to these forward NEM equations, the transverse leakage terms in the WRM equations need to be replaced by partial currents. Because transverse leakage terms of a node are linked to partial currents of many neighboring nodes, replacement of transverse leakage terms by partial currents results in complicated WRM equations. Because mathematical adjoint equations are obtained by transposing the nodal forward equations, direct use of these complicated WRM equations makes the numerical computation of the adjoint solution inefficient. This problem is avoided by treating the transverse leakage terms contained in the WRM equations as additional unknowns and by including the equations defining the transverse leakage terms in terms of partial currents into the nodal forward equations. The mathematical adjoint equations are then derived by transposing the resulting nodal forward equations. This adjoint solution method is verified by comparing nodal adjoint fluxes with the fine-mesh VENTURE solution for the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) pressurized water reactor (PWR) benchmark problem and by comparing the local reactivity changes computed with first-order perturbation theory for the IAEA PWR and the Yonggwang unit 2 PWR with the exact reactivity values determined from the eigenvalue difference between perturbed and unperturbed cores.