ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
NRC approves V.C. Summer’s second license renewal
Dominion Energy’s V.C. Summer nuclear power plant, in Jenkinsville, S.C., has been authorized to operate for 80 years, until August 2062, following the renewal of its operating license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a second time.
James W. Bryson, John C. Lee, Jeré A. Hassberger
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 114 | Number 3 | July 1993 | Pages 238-251
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-A24037
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two methods are presented for optimally calculating spatial distributions of neutron flux in a nuclear reactor core. Both techniques, Kalman filtering and maximum likelihood estimation, simultaneously account for all initial information contained in the nominal core specifications and in-core measurements, as well as all of the uncertainties within the system, to provide a minimum variance estimate of neutron flux. These methods resolve discrepancies in the initial information in a statistically optimal manner, thereby providing valuable insight into the nature of the optimal solution obtained. Despite radically different algorithms, both methods yield the same minimum variance estimate for the quantity of interest. The algorithms have been successfully tested for one-dimensional axial and two-dimensional x-y flux mapping problems with simulated in-core data sets.