ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
AI at work: Southern Nuclear’s adoption of Copilot agents drives fleet forward
Southern Nuclear is leading the charge in artificial intelligence integration, with employee-developed applications driving efficiencies in maintenance, operations, safety, and performance.
The tools span all roles within the company, with thousands of documented uses throughout the fleet, including improved maintenance efficiency, risk awareness in maintenance activities, and better-informed decision-making. The data-intensive process of preparing for and executing maintenance operations is streamlined by leveraging AI to put the right information at the fingertips for maintenance leaders, planners, schedulers, engineers, and technicians.
Edgar Kiefhaber
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 111 | Number 2 | June 1992 | Pages 197-204
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE92-A23933
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For high-accuracy criticality calculations, one should take into account the difference in the energy distributions between prompt and delayed fission neutrons. In steady-state reactor calculations, it is usually assumed that delayed and prompt neutrons are emitted with the same energy distribution. This approximation may lead to systematic deviations in keffof between −0.2 and +0.05%. While for typical cores of liquid-metal-cooled fast reactors and corresponding critical assemblies the effect is usually fairly small, it may become more important for low-enriched k∞ experiments and for highly enriched, high-leakage cores. For group cross-section adjustment procedures usually covering a wide range of critical assemblies with fairly different nuclear characteristics, a proper treatment of the energy distributions of delayed neutrons could be particularly important for excluding systematic differences as far as possible.