ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Isotopes & Radiation
Members are devoted to applying nuclear science and engineering technologies involving isotopes, radiation applications, and associated equipment in scientific research, development, and industrial processes. Their interests lie primarily in education, industrial uses, biology, medicine, and health physics. Division committees include Analytical Applications of Isotopes and Radiation, Biology and Medicine, Radiation Applications, Radiation Sources and Detection, and Thermal Power Sources.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
Kazuo Shin, Yoshiaki Ishii, Kagetomo Miyahara, Yoshitomo Uwamino, Hideyuki Sakai, Sigeo Numata
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 109 | Number 4 | December 1991 | Pages 380-390
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23863
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Spectral measurements of intermediate-energy neutrons (i.e., En ≤ 65 MeV) transmitted through iron, lead, graphite, and concrete shields are described. Concurrently, transmitted spectra of associated gamma rays are also obtained. A collimated beam of neutrons induced by 65-MeV protons in a thick copper target is utilized in the measurements. Measurements of both neutrons and gamma rays penetrating the shields are by an NE-213 scintillator. Monte Carlo calculations using the MORSE code are carried out with the DLC-87 Hilo multigroup cross sections. For neutron spectra, comparison between the measured and calculated spectra indicates that the DLC-87 data reproduce the measured data well for the graphite and the concrete shields but give only slightly higher values at energies of 15 to 30 MeV for the iron shield and overpredict the lead-transmitted spectra. Tests on the cross sections reveal that the underestimation of the total iron cross section by the DLC-87 in the 15- to 25-MeV energy range is the reason for the overestimation of the iron transmitted spectra. Neglecting the elastic scattering in evaluating the lead data is the reason for the large overestimation of the lead transmitted spectra. Gamma-ray spectra obtained behind the graphite and concrete shields are well explained by the transmission of source gamma rays from the copper target through the shields. However, the intensity of the measured photons behind iron and lead shields is much larger than that of transmitted source photons. The discrepancies are not explained by including neutron-induced gamma rays for neutrons from thermal energy up to 15 MeV. The gamma-ray production cross-section data may be required for neutrons >15 MeV to explain the remaining large discrepancies.