ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
P. A. Landeyro, A. Buccafurni
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 108 | Number 2 | June 1991 | Pages 126-149
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE91-A23813
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Estimates are made of the positive reactivity introduced through the growth of the coolant void fraction in the Chernobyl reactor at both the average burnup value given by the Soviets and the maximum value. Using Monte Carlo models, various possible axial burnup distributions, displacer models, conditions in the control channels, and control rod positions are considered in calculating the insertion of positive reactivity by the manual and emergency control rods, that is, the “positive scram.” Two possible scenarios are examined for a second reactivity peak: (a) creation of a mixture of fuel, water, and cladding in a number of central fuel channels, resulting in the explosion of these channels, and (b) uniform vaporization throughout the entire reactor, resulting in reactor depressurization. From the data presented in this study, it can be concluded that vaporization of the cooling water in the fuel channel gave the highest reactivity contribution to the Chernobyl accident. The positive reactivity due to insertion of the manual and emergency control rods played only a minor role in the reactivity balance of the accident.