ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
R. N. Hill, K. O. Ott
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 103 | Number 1 | September 1989 | Pages 12-24
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23656
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A review of worldwide results reveals that reaction rates in the blanket region are generally underpredicted with the discrepancy increasing with penetration; however, these results vary widely. Experiments in the large uniform Purdue University Fast Breeder Blanket Facility blanket yield an accurate quantification of this discrepancy. Using standard production code methods (diffusion theory with 50-group cross sections), a consistent calculated-to-experimental (C/E) drop-off is observed for various reaction rates. A 50% increase in the calculated results at the outer edge of the 51-cm blanket is necessary for agreement with experiments. The usefulness of refined group constant generation, utilizing specialized weighting spectra, and transport theory methods in correcting this discrepancy is analyzed. Refined group constants reduce the discrepancy to half that observed using the standard method. The surprising result is that transport methods have no effect on the blanket deviations; thus, the present multigroup transport theory does not constitute or even contribute to an explanation of the blanket discrepancies. The residual blanket C/E drop-off (about half the standard drop-off) using advanced methods must be caused by approximations that are applied in all current multigroup methods.