ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
T. G. Theofanous, J. L. La Chance, K. A. Williams
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 102 | Number 1 | May 1989 | Pages 74-100
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission pressurized thermal shock (PTS) study had previously identified small-break loss-of-coolant accidents (SBLOCAs) as a risk dominant accident scenario due to (numerically calculated) primary loop flow stagnation at high pressure. The objectives of the present effort were twofold: first, to develop a physically based understanding of controlling thermal-hydraulic phenomena producing such PTS SBLOCA stagnation scenarios and second, to use these insights in developing a simple (computationally efficient) “mapping” tool to quantify the occurrence and thermal behavior of such high-pressure flow stagnation regimes. Review of the previous [transient reactor analysis code (TRAC)] calculations revealed that inaccurate modeling of vapor condensation erroneously produced the flow stagnation and hence overly conservative (rapid) vessel cooldown rates. Using a corrected version of this code, our new calculations now exhibit flow circulation. However, parametric analysis of less likely (more equipment failure—power-operated relief valves/ high-pressure injection pumps) scenarios revealed that flow stagnation was indeed possible but could only occur at lower pressures. This simple mapping procedure has been favorably benchmarked against the (TRAC) system calculations. This tool is therefore useful for screening possible risk dominant SBLOCA scenarios in various pressurized water reactor designs.