ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
TVA nominees promise to support advanced reactor development
Four nominees to serve on the Tennessee Valley Authority Board of Directors told the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that they support the build-out of new advanced nuclear reactors to meet the increased energy demand being shouldered by the country’s largest public utility.
J. R. Torczynski, R. J. Gross, G. N. Hays, G. A. Harms, D. R. Neal, D. A. McArthur, W. J. Alford
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 101 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 280-284
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23615
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The gas-dynamic response of argon to fission-fragment energy deposition is simulated, for the first time explicitly including the coupling between the gas density, which is spatially and temporally varying, and the power density. In simulations of three experiments with different initial fill pressures of argon, good agreement was found between calculated and observed pressure rises, after the experimental pressure rise data from one case were used as a calibration. However, in each case, the calculated thermal energy deposition corresponding to the experimental pressure data was about half the fission-fragment kinetic energy release into the gas predicted by neutron and fission-fragment transport calculations. Also, the experimental pressure data exhibited a decay not seen in the simulations, which did not incorporate an energy-loss mechanism.