ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Christmas Light
’Twas the night before Christmas when all through the house
No electrons were flowing through even my mouse.
All devices were plugged by the chimney with care
With the hope that St. Nikola Tesla would share.
D. Ferenc, B. Antolković, G. Paić, M. Zadro, S. Blagus
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 101 | Number 1 | January 1989 | Pages 1-7
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23590
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A metallic 9Be target was bombarded with 14.6-MeV neutrons. Double-differential cross sections were measured for the (n, α) reaction in the angular range from 0 to 100 deg. The measured alpha-particle spectra and complementary neutron spectra from the literature were analyzed in terms of a combination of sequential and simultaneous breakups. The results show that ∼50% of the total inelastic cross section is due to simultaneous breakup n + 9Be → n + α + 5He, while the remainder is mainly due to neutron inelastic scattering to the three excited states of 9Be: 2.43, 6.76, and 11.28 MeV. This analysis gives evidence of the validity of the constant matrix element model and contradicts evaluations that ignore the simultaneous breakup contributions.