ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
J. S. B. Gajjar
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 100 | Number 4 | December 1988 | Pages 405-413
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23573
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The recent trend toward increased parallelism in supercomputer architectures, together with the need to use existing supercomputer resources more efficiently, has motivated this study of parallel algorithms designed specifically for implementation on parallel machines. Users of parallel machines like the ICL Distributed Array Processor (DAP) are all too familiar with the problem of having to reformulate their algorithms to incorporate the inherent parallelism of the DAP architecture. The individual processing elements of the DAP are comparatively slow, and the full potential of such a machine is only realized if the algorithm used is highly parallel. The very fast processing capabilities of pipeline machines like the Cray-1 or the Cyber 205 tend to obscure this point somewhat, and in fact most users of these machines are content with using existing codes, vectorized where possible. Such a strategy, however, is not appropriate for the parallel processors like the ICL DAP, AMT DAP, the Goodyear MPP, GEC GRID, etc. The application of parallel algorithms to the solution of fluid dynamics problems is considered. Most of the work concerns the solution of the two- and three-dimensional incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, steady and unsteady. The results are relevant for the above-mentioned parallel machines, but the methods can be adapted for use on vector machines. Concerning parallel algorithms, the easiest and possibly those with the widest potential application are relaxation techniques based on red-black (R-B) ordering. The use of R-B successive overrelaxation, R-B LSOR, etc., on two- and three-dimensional cavity flows, unsteady channel, and boundary layer flows at high Reynolds numbers is considered. While these methods are extremely problem dependent, in the favorable cases they can be as competitive as more sophisticated serial “vectorized” algorithms. As far as parallel algorithms are concerned, the most important criteria are what is the cost per iteration, and how fast do they converge. For application on serial machines, the latter factor seems to dominate.