ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
NRC begins special inspection at Hope Creek
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is conducting a special inspection at Hope Creek nuclear plant in New Jersey to investigate the cause of repeated inoperability of one of the plant’s emergency diesel generators, the agency announced in a February 25 news release.
Yasuki Kowata, Nobuo Fukumura
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 99 | Number 4 | August 1988 | Pages 299-312
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23560
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Using the substitution method combined with the pulsed neutron technique, coolant void reactivities of PuO2-UO2 fuel lattices in pressure-tube-type heavy water reactors have been determined as functions of PuO2 enrichment in PuO2-UO2 (0.54 and 0.87 wt%), fissile content of plutonium (91 and 75% fissile plutonium), lattice pitch (Vm/Vf: 7.4 and 9.9), and coolant void fraction (0, 30, 70, 87, and 100%). The reference loading of 1.2 wt% enriched UO2 clusters was progressively replaced by PuO2-UO2 test clusters. The void reactivities were obtained from Simmons and King’s formula in which correction was made for a change of the prompt generation time. As decay constants can be maintained invariable due to substitution, buckling differences were analyzed by the first-order perturbation method, on the assumption that lattices are homogeneous and no difference in diffusion coefficients exists between the two lattices. Void reactivities of test lattices were determined with an accuracy of ∼10% when the minimum number of test fuel clusters was ∼5% of the total. The void reactivity shifted farther to the negative side as the proportion of fissile plutonium was increasingly in the PuO2-UO2 fuel of the same enrichment of plutonium.