ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE on track to deliver high-burnup SNF to Idaho by 2027
The Department of Energy said it anticipated delivering a research cask of high-burnup spent nuclear fuel from Dominion Energy’s North Anna nuclear power plant in Virginia to Idaho National Laboratory by fall 2027. The planned shipment is part of the High Burnup Dry Storage Research Project being conducted by the DOE with the Electric Power Research Institute.
As preparations continue, the DOE said it is working closely with federal agencies as well as tribal and state governments along potential transportation routes to ensure safety, transparency, and readiness every step of the way.
Watch the DOE’s latest video outlining the project here.
Dermott E. Cullen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 99 | Number 2 | June 1988 | Pages 172-181
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23557
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The results of the International Atomic Energy Agency cross-section processing code verification project are described. This project has been conducted over the last 7 yr in an attempt to improve the reliability of the results produced by cross-section processing computer codes. Initial comparisons of results received from 42 participants using 13 different cross-section processing codes demonstrated that, even though all of the codes started from exactly the same evaluated data, in no case did the multigroup cross sections calculated by any two codes agree for all materials and groups used in the comparison. This code verification project has led to positive results by improving cross-section processing codes as well as the conventions used to interpret ENDF/B evaluations. In several cases it has led to changes in ENDF/B evaluations. Although this project only addressed nuclear data processing codes, conclusions can be drawn from the results regarding the reliability of other types of computer codes.
