ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
Katsuhei Kobayashi, Itsuro Kimura, Takamasa Mori
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 99 | Number 2 | June 1988 | Pages 157-171
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23556
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To make an integral check of the evaluated nuclear data for thorium in ENDF/B-IV, ENDF/B- V, and JENDL-2, the energy spectra of angular neutron fluxes calculated with these data bases were compared with those measured in a spherical thoria pile and from a metallic thorium slab by the Linac time-of-flight method in the 1-keV to 10-MeV energy range. The calculations were performed using the Sn code DTF-IV and the Monte Carlo code MCNP. General agreement can be seen between the measurement and the calculation with the above three data bases. In particular, the calculation with ENDF/B-V data shows best agreement with the measurement for the thoria pile at energies above ∼4 MeV. However, the calculations using the ENDF/B-V and JENDL-2 data under-predicted the measurement by 30 to 40% in the energy region from several hundred kilo-electron-volts to a few mega-electron-volts. Sensitivity analysis for the neutron spectra in the above pile and from the slab was also carried out, and the results showed that both of the spectra were sensitive to the total and inelastic scattering cross sections. To determine the reason for the discrepancy between the measured and calculated spectra, the partial cross-section data in ENDF/B-V or JENDL-2 were substituted by those in ENDF/B-IV. The spectra calculated by replacing the inelastic scattering data for thorium in ENDF/ B- V or JENDL-2 by those in ENDF/B-IV have shown good agreement with the ENDF/B-IV-based spectrum, which is rather close to the measurements found in all relevant energy regions.