ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
H-H. Knitter, C. Budtz-Jørgensen
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 99 | Number 1 | May 1988 | Pages 1-12
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE88-A23540
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The fission cross section of 243Am was measured in the neutron energy range from 1 eV to 10 MeV. Several methods of neutron production were employed using the Van de Graaff accelerator and the electron linear accelerator of the Central Bureau of Nuclear Measurements. The energy averaged fission cross section measured at the Geel electron linear accelerator (GELINA) above 100 eV and the fission cross sections measured at the Van de Graaff above 350 keV were determined relative to the 235U(n,f) cross section. The detailed neutron cross sections measured at GELINA in the 1-eV to 30-keV range were measured relative to the 6Li(n, t)4He cross-section shape and were normalized to the known fission integral of 235U between 7.8 and 11 eV. The present data provide unique new information between 1 and 50 eV. In this energy range, fission areas from 31 resonances were determined. In the subthreshold region above 100 eV, the present results demand drastic corrections of the evaluated data files by factors up to 6. Between the first and second chance fission threshold, the present experiment supports the ZEBRA integral experiment, which suggested a reduction of the fission cross section of 243Am in this region by 12% with respect to an earlier data set.