ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
R. C. Lloyd, S. R. Bierman, E. D. Clayton
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 50 | Number 2 | February 1973 | Pages 127-134
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE73-A23236
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Experimental criticality data on borated raschig rings in plutonium nitrate solutions are presented for use in establishing criticality safety limits and in verifying calculational methods for these type systems. The data cover the concentration range between 63- and 412-g Pu/liter for borosilicate-glass raschig rings containing 0.5 and 4.0 wt% boron, and stainless-steel raschig rings containing 1 wt% boron.Criticality was possible in all three experimental vessels used (12-, 18-, and 24-in.-diam cylinders, 42-in. high) with no raschig rings. With rings randomly loaded in the vessels only the 24-in. cylinder could be made critical and then only when loaded with the 0.5 wt% borated rings. The minimum critical volume for this system, poisoned with 19.27 vol% borosilicate-glass rings containing 0.5 wt% boron, was determined to occur at about 300 g Pu/liter as compared to 175-to 200-g Pu/liter without the rings. The minimum critical mass occurred at ≈110-g Pu/liter with the system poisoned, as compared with 30-g Pu/liter if the system had not been poisoned. Exponential measurements on the subcritical assemblies, loaded with 4 wt% borated rings displacing 18.78 vol% solution, indicated that negative bucklings existed for all plutonium nitrate solutions having concentrations below 391-g Pu/liter. Similar measurements on the subcritical assemblies, loaded with 1 wt% borated stainless-steel rings displacing 27 vol% solution, indicated that negative bucklings existed for all concentrations below 412-g Pu/liter.Comparisons between the experimental data and the results of several calculational methods indicate that the validity of a particular calculational technique may be limited to a small concentration region. By treating the raschig rings as vertical parallel tubes displacing an equal volume of solution and using the Monte Carlo code KENO with GAMTEC-II cross sections averaged over the energy spectrum of the plutonium solution, keff values were calculated to within 2% of unity for the experimental critical assemblies presented in this paper. Other calculational methods and cross-section sets used resulted in values of keff departing from unity by as much as 12% low to 6% high, depending on the plutonium concentration. The various methods used are discussed in this paper.
