ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DNFSB spots possible bottleneck in Hanford’s waste vitrification
Workers change out spent 27,000-pound TSCR filter columns and place them on a nearby storage pad during a planned outage in 2023. (Photo: DOE)
While the Department of Energy recently celebrated the beginning of hot commissioning of the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which has begun immobilizing the site’s radioactive tank waste in glass through vitrification, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has reported a possible bottleneck in waste processing. According to the DNFSB, unless current systems run efficiently, the issue could result in the interruption of operations at the WTP’s Low-Activity Waste Facility, where waste vitrification takes place.
During operations, the LAW Facility will process an average of 5,300 gallons of tank waste per day, according to Bechtel, the contractor leading design, construction, and commissioning of the WTP. That waste is piped to the facility after being treated by Hanford’s Tanks Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which filters undissolved solid material and removes cesium from liquid waste.
According to a November 7 activity report by the DNFSB, the TSCR system may not be able to produce waste feed fast enough to keep up with the LAW Facility’s vitrification rate.
Toshihiro Yamamoto, Yoshinori Miyoshi
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 142 | Number 3 | November 2002 | Pages 305-314
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE02-A2309
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Mechanisms of a positive temperature reactivity coefficient that occurs in a dilute plutonium solution are investigated based on the perturbation theory and the four-factor formula. The temperature coefficient of a solution fuel is positive if the adjoint flux increases with neutron energy between 0.05 and 0.2 eV. As compared to 239Pu, 241Pu has a tendency to make the temperature coefficient of a plutonium solution positive because of the energy dependence of the capture cross section of 241Pu. As 241Pu in a plutonium solution decays into 241Am with time, the temperature coefficient of the solution becomes more positive. Since the capture cross sections of most neutron absorbers such as boron and gadolinium decrease with increasing neutron energy between 0.05 and 0.2 eV, soluble absorbers in a plutonium solution make the temperature coefficient positive for higher-concentration plutonium solutions. Cadmium and samarium dissolved in a dilute plutonium solution can exceptionally keep the temperature coefficient negative because of the energy dependence of the capture cross sections. A fixed neutron absorber generally makes the temperature coefficient of a plutonium solution negative regardless of the property of absorber materials.