ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
D. G. Doutriaux, D. G. Andrews
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 49 | Number 3 | November 1972 | Pages 301-309
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22543
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Angular distributions of thermal neutrons at the surfaces of cadmium and copper cylinders were measured by activating directionally sensitive detectors. Comparisons of the experimental data with the theoretical predictions of the distributions were made by the “optical path method,” using a radial flux distribution either calculated with the THERMOS code or measured. Experimental points agree within ±3% with the predicted values given by the measured fine structure, corrected for the shadowing effect due to the collimator, and are about 10% lower than the values predicted by the THERMOS radial flux. The results give some information on the analytical form of the angular flux in the different regions of observation.