ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
How to talk about nuclear
In your career as a professional in the nuclear community, chances are you will, at some point, be asked (or volunteer) to talk to at least one layperson about the technology you know and love. You might even be asked to present to a whole group of nonnuclear folks, perhaps as a pitch to some company tangential to your company’s business. So, without further ado, let me give you some pointers on the best way to approach this important and surprisingly complicated task.
W. N. McElroy, R. J. Armani, E. Tochilin
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 48 | Number 1 | May 1972 | Pages 51-71
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A22456
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Previously reported inconsistencies between activation detector and n, p scattering/time-of-flight (TOF) measurements of the thermal-neutron-induced 235U fission spectrum prompted a comparison of such measurements in the core center and on the surface of a bare 235U assembly, referred to as Godiva. For the present study, TOF measurements and multiple foil measurements of the core and surface spectra of the APFA-III-Godiva are compared. Comparison of the integral fluxes above specified energies for the two methods shows agreement to within ∼5% at core center. Results obtained at in. from the core surface, however, show disagreement between the multiple foil and TOF (and previously reported photo-plate data) which is similar to that found for measurements in the fissionspectrum. Results for the fission spectrum are re-analyzed using the same evaluated energy-dependent cross sections as used for the Godiva study but with a larger number of foil reactions than previously available. A Monte Carlo error analysis code is used for the assignment of errors for the activation results for the Godiva and fission spectrum studies. It is concluded that if the activation measurements of the Godiva and fission spectrum remain firm, and significant changes in current evaluated reaction cross sections are not effected, then increases up to as much as 10 to 15% in the mean energy of the Godiva leakage and fissionspectrum must be considered.
