ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
New company throws hat into uranium conversion ring
Officially launched at CERAWeek 2026, held last week in Houston, Texas, FluxPoint Energy has unveiled plans to develop what it expects to be the first new U.S. uranium conversion facility in more than 70 years, a move aimed at strengthening America’s nuclear fuel supply chain.
The Houston- and McLean, Va.–based company plans to convert uranium oxide into uranium hexafluoride (UF₆), a critical intermediate step in producing fuel for the nation’s existing nuclear reactors as well as next-generation technologies under development.
H. Tellier
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 79 | Number 4 | December 1981 | Pages 393-403
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A21390
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Until now, there has been a discrepancy between the computed and the measured values of the 238U effective capture integral. The former has always been greater than the latter. For this reason, the reactor physicists have used an adjustment of the computed value. At the present time, the accuracy of the cross-section knowledge has increased, and the reactor computation codes are almost exact. Such an adjustment, therefore, is no longer justified. Recently, several new measurements of the resonance parameters were carried out and the use of a multilevel formalism was suggested to compute the 238U cross sections. This paper shows that the simultaneous use of recent parameters and the Reich-Moore formalism explain the discrepancy. For thermal neutron reactors, and depending on the neutron spectrum hardness, between one-half and two-thirds of this discrepancy is explained by the neutron data and the remainder by the multilevel formalism. This last effect is not negligible. We have done similar studies for 232Th, but in this latter case the multilevel effect was found to be much smaller than for the 238U and can be neglected in most applications.