ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
NN Asks: What did you learn from ANS’s Nuclear 101?
Mike Harkin
When ANS first announced its new Nuclear 101 certificate course, I was excited. This felt like a course tailor-made for me, a transplant into the commercial nuclear world. I enrolled for the inaugural session held in November 2024, knowing it was going to be hard (this is nuclear power, of course)—but I had been working on ramping up my knowledge base for the past year, through both my employer and at a local college.
The course was a fast-and-furious roller-coaster ride through all the key components of the nuclear power industry, in one highly challenging week. In fact, the challenges the students experienced caught even the instructors by surprise. Thankfully, the shared intellectual stretch we students all felt helped us band together to push through to the end.
We were all impressed with the quality of the instructors, who are some of the top experts in the field. We appreciated not only their knowledge base but their support whenever someone struggled to understand a concept.
Nelson Jarmie
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 78 | Number 4 | August 1981 | Pages 404-412
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A21375
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We investigated the accuracy of the basic fusion data for the T(d, n)4He, 3He(d, p)4He, T(t, 2n)4He, D(d, n)3He, and D(d, p)T reactions in the 10- to 100-keV bombarding energy region, and assessed the effects of inaccuracies on the design of fusion reactors. The data base for these reactions /particularly the most critical T(d, n)4He reaction/ rests on 25-yr-old experiments whose accuracy (often assumed to be ±5%) has rarely been questioned: Yet, in all except the D + D reactions, there are significant differences among data sets. The errors in the basic data sets may be considerably larger than previously expected, and the effect on design calculations should be significant. Much of the trouble apparently lies in the accuracy of the energy measurements, which are difficult at low energies. Systematic errors of up to 50% are possible in the reactivity values of the present T(d, n)4He data base. The errors in the reactivity will propagate proportionally into the errors in fusion probabilities in reactor calculations. The 3He(d, p)4He reaction cross sections could be in error by as much as 50% in the low-energy region. The D(d, n)3He and D(d, p)T cross sections appear to be well known and consistent. The T(t, 2n)4He cross section is poorly known and may be subject to large systematic errors. Improved absolute measurements for all the reactions in the low bombarding energy region (10 to 100 keV) are needed, but until they are done, the data sets should be left as they are [except for T(t, 2n)4He data, which could be lowered by ∼50%]. The apparent uncertainties of these data sets should be kept in mind.
