ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2025 annual assessments out for U.S. reactors
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released its 2025 annual performance assessments of the country’s 95 operating commercial nuclear reactors. And of the 95 reactors, all but five earned the highest marks.
Nuclear power plant assessments can fall under one of five categories: Licensee Response, Regulatory Response, Degraded Cornerstone, Degraded Performance, and Unacceptable Performance. Ninety reactors fell under Licensee Response, the highest performance category in safety and security. Plants that achieve this level of performance are subject to a Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) baseline inspection.
Nelson Jarmie
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 78 | Number 4 | August 1981 | Pages 404-412
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A21375
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We investigated the accuracy of the basic fusion data for the T(d, n)4He, 3He(d, p)4He, T(t, 2n)4He, D(d, n)3He, and D(d, p)T reactions in the 10- to 100-keV bombarding energy region, and assessed the effects of inaccuracies on the design of fusion reactors. The data base for these reactions /particularly the most critical T(d, n)4He reaction/ rests on 25-yr-old experiments whose accuracy (often assumed to be ±5%) has rarely been questioned: Yet, in all except the D + D reactions, there are significant differences among data sets. The errors in the basic data sets may be considerably larger than previously expected, and the effect on design calculations should be significant. Much of the trouble apparently lies in the accuracy of the energy measurements, which are difficult at low energies. Systematic errors of up to 50% are possible in the reactivity values of the present T(d, n)4He data base. The errors in the reactivity will propagate proportionally into the errors in fusion probabilities in reactor calculations. The 3He(d, p)4He reaction cross sections could be in error by as much as 50% in the low-energy region. The D(d, n)3He and D(d, p)T cross sections appear to be well known and consistent. The T(t, 2n)4He cross section is poorly known and may be subject to large systematic errors. Improved absolute measurements for all the reactions in the low bombarding energy region (10 to 100 keV) are needed, but until they are done, the data sets should be left as they are [except for T(t, 2n)4He data, which could be lowered by ∼50%]. The apparent uncertainties of these data sets should be kept in mind.