ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Nuclear is prominent in Genesis Mission projects
The Department of Energy announced yesterday that it has selected 278 projects under the Genesis Mission request for applications, which opened in March.
According to a White House press release on the same day, $5 billion in federal commitments will be put toward the Genesis Mission.
Edward L. H. Tang
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 69 | Number 1 | January 1979 | Pages 65-75
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE79-A21286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The rod-drop experiment has been studied for the purpose of predicting reactor resonance power level. A simplified model, referred to here as the “collective model,” is introduced for experimental analysis of the rod-drop transient response. The mathematical description of this model is formulated by describing the experimentally observed oscillatory response by an overall damping factor and an overall oscillatory frequency. Based on this model, it is found that the overall damping factor is approximately a linear function of the reactor power. Accordingly, we propose an experimental procedure, the method of least-squares approach, which provides an exponential approach to the resonance power level as a function of the number of rod drops. It is shown that the accuracy of measurement in the rod-drop experiment greatly affects this technique for core dynamic analysis. The present results show that for an experiment of negligible experimental error, only two or three rod drops are needed to predict the resonance power level up to an accuracy of 0.2%, while for an experiment of ±5% in error, it requires four to five rod drops to reach an accuracy of 0.8%.