ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
The top 10 states of nuclear
The past few years have seen a concerted effort from many U.S. states to encourage nuclear development. The momentum behind nuclear-friendly policies has grown considerably, with many states repealing moratoriums, courting nuclear developers and suppliers, and in some cases creating advisory groups and road maps to push deployment of new nuclear reactors.
V. J. Orphan, C. G. Hoot, Joseph John
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 42 | Number 3 | December 1970 | Pages 352-366
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A21223
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Gamma-ray production cross sections were measured for the 16O(n, xγ) reaction from 6.35- to 16.52-MeV neutron energy. The Gulf General Atomic LINAC was used to produce a pulsed source of neutrons having a continuous distribution of neutron energies. A 30-cm3 Ge(Li) detector, placed at 125 deg to the incident neutron beam, was used to measure the γ-ray spectra. The corresponding neutron energy was determined by the time-of-flight technique. The two-parameter data (γ-ray energy, neutron energy) were processed with an on-line computer and sorted into 10 γ-ray spectra spanning the range 6.35 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.52 MeV. From these data we obtained average differential gamma-ray production cross sections for 9 gamma rays from the 16O(n, xγ) reaction. The cross sections are in good agreement with other recent measurements, but show rather large disagreement with some earlier measurements. The total nonelastic cross section obtained by summing the partial cross sections is consistent with the nonelastic cross section obtained from the difference between the total cross section and the total elastic cross section for En < H MeV. However, in the range 11 MeV ≤ En ≤ 16.5 MeV, there is a serious discrepancy for which a possible explanation is discussed.