ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Alan Staub, D. R. Harris, and Mark Goldsmith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 34 | Number 3 | December 1968 | Pages 263-274
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE68-A21091
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A group of 11 aqueous critical experiments fueled by 233U and 235U and performed by Gwin and Magnuson have been analyzed to serve as integral tests of nuclear data important in reactor design. Measured eignvalues were corrected for various effects including the presence of the aluminum container, departures from sphericity, delayed-neutron importance, and room return. Eigenvalues were calculated in simplified P-3 approximation using 60 energy groups, and determinations were made of the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.1%) associated with this treatment. Within the eigenvalue uncertainties (±0.25%) resulting from fuel inventories, it was concluded that fissile nuclide and H(n,γ) cross sections were adequate to match calculations and experiments but that there was evidence of erroneous nuclear data important in determining neutron leakage. In particular, a substantially harder 233U fission neutron spectrum seems to be indicated.