ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
IEA report: Challenges need to be resolved to support global nuclear energy growth
The International Energy Agency published a new report this month outlining how continued innovation, government support, and new business models can unleash nuclear power expansion worldwide.
The Path to a New Era for Nuclear Energy report “reviews the status of nuclear energy around the world and explores risks related to policies, construction, and financing.”
Find the full report at IEA.org.
T. Auerbach, T. Gozani and P. Schmid
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 21 | Number 2 | February 1965 | Pages 186-193
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A21042
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The conventional method of determining excess reactivity and control-rod worth by summing reactivity decrements in a heterogeneous poisoning experiment may give rise to serious errors because of the neglect of interference effects between rods and poison. In this paper, it is suggested that interference may be accounted for by the simple assumption that it affects only the total control-rod worth but not the shape of the normalized reactivity versus height curve. It is shown that this assumption allows results to be extrapolated back to the rod worth in the unpoisoned core. The method is demonstrated in two poisoning sequences carried out in the Swiss swimming-pool reactor SAPHIR. The values obtained for excess reactivity and control-rod worth agree well with each other and with a direct measurement. It is shown that the normalized regulating curve is indeed independent of poison and that the method of summing reactivity decrements is seriously in error when applied to the second poisoning sequence.