ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Prepare for the 2025 Nuclear PE Exam with ANS guides
The next opportunity to earn professional engineer (PE) licensure in nuclear engineering is this fall, and now is the time to sign up and begin studying with the help of materials like the online module program offered by the American Nuclear Society.
T. Auerbach, T. Gozani and P. Schmid
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 21 | Number 2 | February 1965 | Pages 186-193
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE65-A21042
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The conventional method of determining excess reactivity and control-rod worth by summing reactivity decrements in a heterogeneous poisoning experiment may give rise to serious errors because of the neglect of interference effects between rods and poison. In this paper, it is suggested that interference may be accounted for by the simple assumption that it affects only the total control-rod worth but not the shape of the normalized reactivity versus height curve. It is shown that this assumption allows results to be extrapolated back to the rod worth in the unpoisoned core. The method is demonstrated in two poisoning sequences carried out in the Swiss swimming-pool reactor SAPHIR. The values obtained for excess reactivity and control-rod worth agree well with each other and with a direct measurement. It is shown that the normalized regulating curve is indeed independent of poison and that the method of summing reactivity decrements is seriously in error when applied to the second poisoning sequence.