ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
José Canosa
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 19 | Number 3 | July 1964 | Pages 329-342
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE19-03-329
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The problem of adiabatic excursions in a reactor is studied in general. We let the prompt temperature reactivity feedback be an unspecified function of temperature, ρ = ρ0 = ρ0 + f(T), where ρ is total reactivity, ρ0 initial step reactivity and f(T) the feedback function. The similarity of the behavior of the reactor for different f(T) is established by means of a topological (qualitative) analysis. A quantitative asymptotic solution of the non-linear system of DE describing the reactor is presented. In delayed critical excursions, the delayed neutrons play a determining role. In the first part of a prompt excursion, the delayed-neutron source is nil; however this is not so in the second part, where it contributes appreciably to the excursion. These conclusions are shown to be valid in general, and allow us to write down almost directly the (approximate) quantitative solution of the non-linear system for any f(T). These results are correlated with the experimental data for the adiabatic excursions of a UO2 core in SPERT I; in this case the (prompt) dependence of the reactivity on energy is of the form ρ = ρ0 - 4.588 × 10-4E0.74.
