ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Oct 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
November 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
My story: Stanley Levinson—ANS member since 1983
Levinson early in his career and today.
As a member of the American Nuclear Society, I have been to many conferences. The International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Analysis (PSA ’25), embedded in ANS Annual Meeting in Chicago in June, held special significance for me with the PSA ’25 opening plenary session recognizing the 50th anniversary of the publication of WASH-1400, which helped define my career. Reflecting on that milestone sent me back to 1975, when I was just an undergraduate student studying nuclear engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in Troy, N.Y., focusing on my mechanics, fluids, and thermodynamic classes as well as my first set of nuclear engineering classes. At that time—and many times since—the question “Why nuclear engineering?” was raised.
D. J. Brenner, M. Zaider, J. J. Coyne, H.G. Menzel, R. E. Prael
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 95 | Number 4 | April 1987 | Pages 311-315
Technical Note | doi.org/10.13182/NSE87-A20442
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Neutron cross sections on carbon at and above 14 MeV are of interest for a variety of applications. It is argued that the ENDF/B-V evaluation of the nonelastic cross sections is in some error; this is due in part to the “subtraction” technique used for evaluating the nonelastic cross section, and to an overreliance on old nuclear emulsion data. In addition, secondary uncharged- (and, for biomedical applications, charged-) particle spectra are important. It is shown that kerma-factor calculations are very sensitive to the secondary charged-particle spectrum. Thus an assessment of the reaction mechanisms, leading to evaluated secondary particle spectra, is also needed.