ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
New laws offer nuclear industry incentives for existing power plant uprates
This year, the U.S. nuclear industry received a much-needed economic boost that could help preserve operating nuclear power plants and incentivize upgrades that extend their lifespan and power output.
Signed into law in 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act offers production tax credits (PTCs) for existing nuclear power plants and either PTCs or investment tax credits (ITCs) for new carbon-free generation. These credits could make power uprates—increasing the maximum power level at which a commercial plant may operate—a much more appealing option for utilities.
Donald Bogart
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 41 | Number 1 | July 1970 | Pages 37-46
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20361
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The problem of precise calculation of spatial distributions of capture in resonance absorbers is crucial to the design of layered shields. Errors in spatial distribution of capture occur in multigroup neutron-transport calculations because of the necessarily broad energy groups employed. The single average-capture cross section in each group results in large underestimates of the capture rates near surfaces of resonance absorbers. Consequently, the spatial-capture gamma-ray generation and escape fraction are also in error. A method is presented for computing spatial-resonance-capture rates in thick layers. It employs group-effective resonance integrals to precalculate group-effective resonance cross sections that are universal functions of distance into the absorptive layer. The method is illustrated for captures in 238U for the energy region 0.5 eV to 100 keV. The method is applied to a spherical reactor-shield configuration that contains alternate layers of depleted uranium and lithium hydride. Detailed comparison is made of the results of a discrete ordinates multigroup calculation with those of the present method. The comparison shows that the difference in spatial-capture distribution of the Sn broad treatment of resonance capture causes the capture gamma-ray dose to be always underestimated. For example, the difference in spatial-capture distribution in a 7-cm slab of 238U causes the leakage dose to be a factor of 2 smaller than that obtained with the present method. The apparent generality of the present method suggests that it may be applied directly to the results of layered shield calculations made by Sn broad-group methods. Application of the method to the experimental variation of epicadmium capture with depth from the surface of metallic-uranium rods up to 5 cm in diameter as measured by Hellstrand provided spatial capture rates that agreed with experiment very well.