ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
How to talk about nuclear
In your career as a professional in the nuclear community, chances are you will, at some point, be asked (or volunteer) to talk to at least one layperson about the technology you know and love. You might even be asked to present to a whole group of nonnuclear folks, perhaps as a pitch to some company tangential to your company’s business. So, without further ado, let me give you some pointers on the best way to approach this important and surprisingly complicated task.
Hiroshi Motoda
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 41 | Number 1 | July 1970 | Pages 1-13
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20357
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A variational treatment of the burnup optimization of continuous scattered refueling is presented and numerical solutions are given for a slab reactor. It is made quantitatively clear how the reactor dimension, the xenon and the Doppler feedback reactivity, the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the reflector performance affect the power distribution that maximizes the average discharge exposure. Power flattening and burnup maximization are contradictory in general, but are consistent if, and only if, the condition of the perfect reflection at the core boundary is satisfied. The optimal power distribution is peaked in the central—and depleted in the outer region; and becomes flatter as the reflector performance is increased. The maximum average burnup depends on the burnup dependence of fission cross section and the strength of the Doppler and the xenon feedback reactivity, even if the average burnup calculated by the point-reactor model is the same. The former effect on the optimal power distribution is very small but the latter effects greatly contribute to power flattening. Both effects reduce the maximum burnup and the effects of the latter two are of comparable order. As the reactor becomes smaller, the maximum burnup decreases almost linearly to the neutron leakage. Optimal refueling has an advantage of more than 10% in the average burnup over the conventional flat-refueling rate method. However the difference from the flat-burnup method is very small, considering that the optimal refueling is handicapped by its very bad power distribution.