ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Grant awarded for advanced reactor workforce needs in southeast U.S.
North Carolina State University and the Electric Power Research Institute have been awarded a $500,000 grant by the NC Collaboratory for “An Assessment to Define Advanced Reactor Workforce Needs,” a project that aims to investigate job needs to help enable new nuclear development and deployment in North Carolina and surrounding areas.
Dimitri G. Naberejnev, Claude Mounier, Richard Sanchez
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 131 | Number 2 | February 1999 | Pages 222-229
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE99-A2030
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
At this time, experimental transmission data are analyzed with codes like REFIT or SAMMY, which use the free gas model to fit the form of the resonances. The use of the resonance parameters issued from such analysis for further reconstruction of the cross section with codes like NJOY can result in nonnegligible errors in the cross sections as well as in the reaction rates.To analyze the bias introduced on resonance parameters by the use of the free gas model and its consequences on reaction rates, we set up a numerical experiment that closely follows the actual scheme of the nuclear data evaluation.First, we use resonance parameters from the JEF2.2 nuclear library to calculate our reference cross section with Lamb's harmonic crystal model. This cross section is then used to simulate transmission coefficients, and a new set of resonance parameters is obtained using the code REFIT to fit the shape of the transmission with the help of the free gas model. These resonance parameters are used to estimate the errors in the reaction rates.We conclude that the free gas model does not ensure reaction rate conservation. A comparison of the capture rates showed that the discrepancy between this model (with the bias on the resonance parameters described here) and the harmonic crystal model (with initial JEF2.2 parameters) is important for reactor physics. For the first resonance of 238U, which represents 30% of the total 238U absorption in a thermal nuclear reactor, the error in the capture reaction rates reaches 3% for the biased resonance parameters issued from UO2 analysis, and up to 1% for the biased resonance parameters issued from metallic uranium analysis. Such a discrepancy could be corrected using a crystal model for the experimental data analysis.