ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The RAIN scale: A good intention that falls short
Radiation protection specialists agree that clear communication of radiation risks remains a vexing challenge that cannot be solved solely by finding new ways to convey technical information.
Earlier this year, an article in Nuclear News described a new radiation risk communication tool, known as the Radiation Index, or, RAIN (“Let it RAIN: A new approach to radiation communication,” NN, Jan. 2025, p. 36). The authors of the article created the RAIN scale to improve radiation risk communication to the general public who are not well-versed in important aspects of radiation exposures, including radiation dose quantities, units, and values; associated health consequences; and the benefits derived from radiation exposures.
Dimitri G. Naberejnev, Claude Mounier, Richard Sanchez
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 131 | Number 2 | February 1999 | Pages 222-229
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE99-A2030
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
At this time, experimental transmission data are analyzed with codes like REFIT or SAMMY, which use the free gas model to fit the form of the resonances. The use of the resonance parameters issued from such analysis for further reconstruction of the cross section with codes like NJOY can result in nonnegligible errors in the cross sections as well as in the reaction rates.To analyze the bias introduced on resonance parameters by the use of the free gas model and its consequences on reaction rates, we set up a numerical experiment that closely follows the actual scheme of the nuclear data evaluation.First, we use resonance parameters from the JEF2.2 nuclear library to calculate our reference cross section with Lamb's harmonic crystal model. This cross section is then used to simulate transmission coefficients, and a new set of resonance parameters is obtained using the code REFIT to fit the shape of the transmission with the help of the free gas model. These resonance parameters are used to estimate the errors in the reaction rates.We conclude that the free gas model does not ensure reaction rate conservation. A comparison of the capture rates showed that the discrepancy between this model (with the bias on the resonance parameters described here) and the harmonic crystal model (with initial JEF2.2 parameters) is important for reactor physics. For the first resonance of 238U, which represents 30% of the total 238U absorption in a thermal nuclear reactor, the error in the capture reaction rates reaches 3% for the biased resonance parameters issued from UO2 analysis, and up to 1% for the biased resonance parameters issued from metallic uranium analysis. Such a discrepancy could be corrected using a crystal model for the experimental data analysis.