ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Uranium prices rise to highest level in more than two months
Analyst firm Trading Economics posted a uranium futures value of about $82.00 per pound on January 5—the highest futures value in more than two months.
In late October, it had listed a futures price of about $82.30/lb. By late November, the price had fallen to under $76.00/lb.
K. S. Smith
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 3 | July 1982 | Pages 451-458
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20286
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An investigation of first-order perturbation (FOP) methods for computing sample worths has been performed. It is demonstrated that conventional cell homogenization methods introduce errors into FOP reactivity calculations because the intracell structure of adjoint fluxes is neglected. These errors are such that the conventional FOP reactivity expression is not accurate to first order, even in the limit of infinitesimal perturbations. A method for avoiding such approximations is introduced and applied to the calculation of small sample worths in plate-type fast reactor critical assemblies. It is demonstrated that errors introduced by real flux weighting of cross sections are such that homogenized FOP reactivity calculations overestimate fissile material worths in several critical assemblies by 5 to 10%. It is shown that these errors arise because of the heterogeneous nature of plate-type critical assemblies, and when appropriate reactivity calculations (which account for spatial heterogeneity of adjoint fluxes) are performed, a significant fraction of the long-standing central worth discrepancy is eliminated.