ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
M. Segev
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 81 | Number 2 | June 1982 | Pages 151-160
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A20082
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Let the lattice consist of an infinite uniform distribution of clusters in an (external) moderator, and let the cluster consist of a uniform distribution of absorber lumps in an (internal) moderator. The lattice is characterized by the parameters: cluster mean chord length, L; probability of neutrons leaving a cluster to collide in the external moderator prior to crossing a cluster, Γ; adjustable Bell factor for the clusters, A; lump mean chord length, I; probability of neturons leaving a lump (in an infinite cluster) to collide in the internal moderator prior to crossing a lump, γ; adjustable Bell factor for the lumps, a; internal moderator volume fraction in the cluster, υm; internal moderator macroscopic cross section, Σm. The flux in (or resonance integral of) the absorber lump is equivalent to the flux in (or resonance integral of) an infinite medium consisting of the lump material, homogenously mixed with a moderator of cross section Σe, given by where The expression for Σe is quite general, the only restriction on the lattice structure being that a cluster contain many lumps. The factor β can be termed the “double heterogeneity” factor abbreviated “doublet.” In the limit of an infinite single cluster β → 1, yielding the correct single heterogeneity expression for Σe. In the limit of small lump volume fractions, the expression for Σe reduces to the expression of Goldstein, as derived from the work of Lane et al. Goldstein's formulation was successfully compared with the experimental data of Lewis and Conolly. The WIMS formulation for a single cluster is almost equivalent to the above formulas with a difference that becomes significant only if the cluster contains a small number of lumps. The equivalence formulations by Tsuchihashi et al., as well as by Stamatelatos, yield results which are discrepant with those of the formulations discussed above and, therefore, have to be judged unsatisfactory.