ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
J. T. Mihalczo, J. J. Lynn, J. R. Taylor
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 130 | Number 1 | September 1998 | Pages 153-163
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE96-121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactivity worth of a central void region in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) unmoderated and unreflected uranium (93.20 wt% 235U) metal sphere was obtained by replacement measurements in a small (0.460-cm-diam) central spherical region in this 3.4420-in.-radius sphere. The measured central void region worth was 9.165 ± 0.023 ¢ using the delayed neutron parameters of Keepin, Wimett, and Zeigler to obtain the reactivity from the measured stable reactor periods. This value is slightly larger than measurements for GODIVA I with larger cylindrical samples of uranium (93.70 wt% 235U) in the center: 135.50 ± 0.12 ¢/mol for GODIVA I and 138.05 ± 0.34 ¢/mol for the ORNL sphere measurements. The difference could be due to sample size effect. The central worth was also calculated by neutron transport theory methods to be 6.02 ± 0.01 × 10-4 k. The measured and calculated values are related by the effective delayed neutron fraction. The value of the effective delayed neutron fraction obtained in this way from the ORNL sphere is 0.00657 ± 0.00002, which is in excellent agreement with that obtained from GODIVA I measurements, where the effective delayed neutron fraction was determined as the increment between delayed and prompt criticality and was 0.0066. From these ORNL measurements, using the delayed neutron parameters of ENDF-B/VI to obtain the reactivity from the stable reactor period measurements, the central void worth is 7.984 ± 0.021 ¢, and the inferred effective delayed neutron fraction is 0.00754. These values are 14.2% higher than those obtained from use of the Keepin, Wimett, and Zeigler delayed neutron data and produce a value of effective delayed neutron fraction in disagreement with GODIVA I measurements, thus questioning the usefulness of the six-group delayed neutron parameters (fast fission) of uranium from ENDF-B/VI for obtaining the reactivity from the measured reactor period using the Inhour equation.
