ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
Hash Hashemian: Visionary leadership
As Dr. Hashem M. “Hash” Hashemian prepares to step into his term as President of the American Nuclear Society, he is clear that he wants to make the most of this unique moment.
A groundswell in public approval of nuclear is finding a home in growing governmental support that is backed by a tailwind of technological innovation. “Now is a good time to be in nuclear,” Hashemian said, as he explained the criticality of this moment and what he hoped to accomplish as president.
Raymond J. Juzaitis
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 80 | Number 3 | March 1982 | Pages 424-447
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A19829
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A deterministic analysis of the computational cost associated with geometric splitting/Russian roulette in Monte Carlo radiation transport calculations is presented. Appropriate integro-differential equations (based on the theory of Monte Carlo errors) are developed for the first and second moments of the tally as well as for the expected value of time per particle history, given that splitting with Russian roulette takes place at one or more internal surfaces of the geometry. The equations are solved using a standard Sn solution technique, allowing for the prediction of computer cost (formulated as the product of sample variance and time per particle history) associated with a given set of splitting parameters. Extensive numerical results relating to the transport model chosen for study (namely, particle transmission through a semi-infinite slab shield composed of an isotropically scattering medium) are presented. Optimum splitting surface locations and splitting ratios are determined. Single-surface results indicate that the threshold slab thickness for which any splitting becomes cost effective varies from ∼2 to >7 mean-free-paths, depending on the degree of scattering in the medium. When splitting is cost effective, it is so over a wide range of surface locations. Benefits of such an analysis are particularly noteworthy for transport problems in which splitting is apt to be extensively employed (e.g., deep-penetration calculations).