ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The RAIN scale: A good intention that falls short
Radiation protection specialists agree that clear communication of radiation risks remains a vexing challenge that cannot be solved solely by finding new ways to convey technical information.
Earlier this year, an article in Nuclear News described a new radiation risk communication tool, known as the Radiation Index, or, RAIN (“Let it RAIN: A new approach to radiation communication,” NN, Jan. 2025, p. 36). The authors of the article created the RAIN scale to improve radiation risk communication to the general public who are not well-versed in important aspects of radiation exposures, including radiation dose quantities, units, and values; associated health consequences; and the benefits derived from radiation exposures.
O. E. Dwyer, H. C. Berry
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 40 | Number 2 | May 1970 | Pages 317-330
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A19692
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper summarizes the results of an analytical study carried out for the purpose of determining the effects of cladding thickness and conductivity on fully developed heat transfer to liquid metals flowing in-line through unbaffled rod bundles. The study is based on slug flow and the assumption that the heat flux on the inner wall of the cladding is uniform in all directions. It was shown earlier that slug-flow results for liquid metals are very similar to those for turbulent flow in practical Pe ranges, particularly when the results are put in certain dimensionless forms, and it is shown in the present study that the assumption of circumferentially uniform heat flux on the inner wall of the cladding is perfectly valid for any practical nuclear-reactor design for a central-station power plant. The problem required the simultaneous solution of the differential energy equations for both the coolant and cladding, which are coupled by the local temperature and heat-flux conditions existing at the coolant-cladding interface. There are three prime independent variables: rod spacing (P/D), relative cladding thickness (r2 − r1)/r2, and relative cladding conductivity (kw/kf). These have been varied over the ranges 1.05 to 1.30, 0.025 to 0.300, and 0.10 to 4.00, respectively. The following quantities have been calculated as functions of the above independent variables: rod-average heat transfer coefficients, circumferential variation of outer-surface cladding temperature, the same for the inner surface, circumferential variation of local heat flux, and finally, circumferential variation of local heat-transfer coefficient. The results are all expressed in the form of convenient dimensionless groups and are correlated by simple mathematical expressions, for ready use by the design engineer. It is found that, of the three prime independent variables, the P/D ratio has by far the greatest influence on the heat transfer behavior of the system; and that, of the remaining two variables, the thermal conductivity ratio, kw/kf, has appreciably more influence than the relative-cladding-thickness ratio (r2 − r1)/r2. The higher the P/D ratio and the lower the (r2 − r1)/r2 and kw/kf ratios, the more the system behaves like the uniform-wall-heat-flux case; and it is interesting to note that in many practical situations the simple uniform-wall-heat-flux assumption is quite adequate.