ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
DOE issues new NEPA rule and procedures—and accelerates DOME reactor testing
Meeting a deadline set in President Trump’s May 23 executive order “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the Department of Energy,” the DOE on June 30 updated information on its National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) rulemaking and implementation procedures and published on its website an interim final rule that rescinds existing regulations alongside new implementing procedures.
Gerald P. Calame
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 20 | Number 3 | November 1964 | Pages 352-357
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE64-A19580
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The asymptotic decay constant for the die-away experiment in which a moderator is poisoned with a non-l/ν absorber is expanded as the power series with λ0 the decay constant for the unpoisoned moderator and N the concentration of the non-l/ν absorber. The coefficients in the expansion are computed with the Mass-1 and the Nelkin scattering kernels for water poisoned with Cd, Gd and Sm. The computed coefficients δσeff/δ N are in significant disagreement with experimental values: the latter are some five times as large as the computed values.