ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Materials Science & Technology
The objectives of MSTD are: promote the advancement of materials science in Nuclear Science Technology; support the multidisciplines which constitute it; encourage research by providing a forum for the presentation, exchange, and documentation of relevant information; promote the interaction and communication among its members; and recognize and reward its members for significant contributions to the field of materials science in nuclear technology.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Senate committee hears from energy secretary nominee Chris Wright
Wright
Chris Wright, president-elect Trump’s pick to lead the U.S. Department of Energy, spent hours today fielding questions from members of the U.S. Senate’s committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
During the hearing, Wright—who’s spent most of his career in fossil fuels—made comments in support of nuclear energy and efforts to expand domestic generation in the near future. Asked what actions he would take as energy secretary to improve the development and deployment of SMRs, Wright said: “It’s a big challenge, and I’m new to government, so I can’t list off the five levers I can pull. But (I’ve been in discussions) about how to make it easier to research, to invest, to build things. The DOE has land at some of its facilities that can be helpful in this regard.”
Gaston Kayser, Jean Charpenel, Claude Jamond
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 128 | Number 2 | February 1998 | Pages 144-185
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE98-A1950
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The SCARABEE-N in-pile tests were performed between 1983 and 1990. Their main objective was to study the consequences of a hypothetical total instantaneous blockage (TIB) at the entrance of a liquid-metal reactor subassembly at full power. After 14 tests, mainly with fresh fuel, this accident scenario may be fairly well described. It has been shown that no violent, energetic fuel/coolant interactions take place, that almost no fuel is ejected out of the fissile zone, and that the melt penetration into the neighboring subassemblies proceeds rapidly. Progress has been made on understanding the behavior of mixed boiling pools, and hexcan melt-through thresholds can be established.Codes have been developed (PHYSURA-GRAPPE and SURFASS), and SCARABEE-N tests have been used to help in the evaluation of others (SIMMER II and SABRE). Interesting information for other accident situations has been made available, especially for the transition phase.Concerning the specific case of the TIB accident, it has been shown that the evolution of the molten zone can be represented by calculations in which energy equations play the essential role. For a Superphénix-type subassembly, PHYSURA-GRAPPE and analytic calculations show that after ~30 s after the beginning of the blockage, there exists a serious risk of propagation beyond a 7-subassembly pool. This can be prevented only by an adequate detection system leading to scram before this time.The SCARABEE-N program helped to solve the problem for which it was designed; moreover, it yielded scientific expertise for other areas and was a precious training ground for many safety scientists and engineers. It also showed the limits of so-called mechanistic models for very complex problems and the sustained usefulness of simple engineering reasoning.